The British
Army band played "The World Turned Upside Down" when Gen. Cornwallis
surrendered to Gen. Washington at Yorktown in 1781. A similar tune should be
wafting through the streets of Kansas City these days as Google rolls out its
high-speed fiber network to that city.
Google's
"let me show you how to build high-speed infrastructure" effort is
not only thumbing its nose at the cable and telephone companies, but is also
upending the 150 year old paradigm of network supremacy. Ever since the
telegraph the network was in control of how it would be used and what it would
offer. Over the years government policy has been instituted to control potential
abuse of that power. Now, in Kansas City a network user has inverted that
history. A service that rides the network now has the economic wherewithal to
build its own network, offer vastly expanded capabilities, and call its own tune.
The Google
all-fiber network in Kansas City will offer speeds of 1 gigabit per second for
$70 per month ($120 if you want to add cable service). Google triumphantly
points out this is far in excess of the U.S. national broadband average of 5.8
mbps. The Wall Street Journal reports, "the move was designed to
accelerate the deployment of faster networks and show off the sort of services
that high-speed connections can enable."
It has also
thrown the old ideas about communications networks – and communications
regulation - into a cocked hat.
Google
Fiber, for instance, will not offer telephone service. Why should it?
Traditional telephone service is an Alexander Graham Bell legacy. Today a voice
call is an Internet application, no different from Angry Birds. Consumers
subscribing to Google Fiber will be able to make phone calls, but those
connections will be more like Skype than Bell; zeroes and ones no different
from everything else the network carries.
Some traditional
cable channels like HBO and the products of the Disney Company such as ESPN
have chosen not to provide retransmission rights to Google. It’s a risky move as
the Web appears primed to do for television what it did to newspapers. Google
Fiber subscribers may not be able to get HBO, etc., but the Internet is full of
movies and entertainment that the fiber will stream quickly. Google Fiber could
mean that what today is called "over the top" content because it
comes from other than network-controlled sources may soon be the standard.
Google’s own video service, YouTube, has already copied HBO’s strategy of
specially-produced programs.
Regulatory
assumptions (many of which have advantaged Google) are particularly challenged
by Google Fiber. For a century public policy has been based on assuring that
network providers do not abuse their position vis a vis network users. The
assumption that the network provider holds the economic upper hand, however,
just went out the window in Kansas City. For the first time the economic
strength of a network user is sufficient to allow it to build its own
facilities.
Public policy
used to worry about a network owner cross-subsidizing to control content. Now
all of a sudden, a content company can cross-subsidize into the network
business. Want to guess the default search engine for Google Fiber?
That
cross-subsidy, however, is being put to some socially advantageous purposes.
For decades the federal government and network providers have engaged in an
elaborate plan to subsidize high-cost areas and populations. Recently the FCC
announced its new version, called “Connect America” to support broadband
deployment. Now Google is giving away basic Internet access for free. Any
resident located in one of Google's “fiberhood” footprints can receive free
Internet service at speeds of 5 mbps (i.e., about the national average). Five
megs for zip is pretty amazing - all thanks to the cross-subsidy from the
Google services those customers will use. For years we've been talking about
how the Internet would make phone service free - Google just made the Internet
free!
There are
limits to this seeming Nirvana, however. Unlike cable and telephone companies
which must provide service in all areas of a city, Google will provide service
only in areas where advance signups assure the economic viability of providing
the service. Imagine the outrage cable companies would face with city councils
and telcos would face with PUCs if they engaged in what some would no doubt
describe as “redlining.”
Google Fiber
subscribers who sign up for cable service will receive an Android-powered
tablet as the TV remote control. Not only will it allow Web-based interaction
with the TV, but also it completes the power play for Google. Now Google
services, running on Google hardware, powered by Google’s OS have moved the
nexus of market power away from the network. The ultimate edge player has just
integrated backwards to control the last part of what it doesn’t already own –
the network itself. Indeed, the world has turned upside down.